Showing posts with label forest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label forest. Show all posts

March 10, 2012

Some things I saw in the woods

March 10, 2012

I've decided to embrace the lack of color in the region and season, and work on some black and white pictures.

The light has been really spectacular the last couple of days. I guess it's getting to be spring time. I'll go for another walk tonight, probably in the same woods to see what I see. These were all at 35mm focal length (on a DX/crop body), today I'll try with my other lens, a zoom, but at 24mm.

Forest

Forest

France (2012)


Pathway

Pathway

France (2012)


Trees for the Forest

Trees for the Forest

France (2012)


Ray of light (I)

Ray of Light (I)

France (2012)


These are all LR4 (not beta) conversions. I'm looking at Nik Silver Efex Pro 2, but right now it doesn't agree with LR4, too new I guess. When they are cooperating I'll give the trial another go.

February 6, 2012

Giants

February 6, 2012

Another from last summer's trip to the US.

Old Growth

Old Growth

Oregon (2011)


This is a very difficult shot, the lighting was so extreme. I'm not sure what I could have done differently, but I suppose it's possible that this kind of situation cries out for HDR. I suppose I was reluctant to do that hand held (no tripod at the time, nor yet, but soon!), but I think next time I'll give it a try. I think I would like to go a bit wider next time too. Next time...

Forest Fungus

February 5, 2012

From my walk in the woods last week.

Forest Fungus I

Forest Fungus I

France (2012)

Forest Fungus II

Forest Fungus II

France (2012)

Forest Fungus III

Forest Fungus III

France (2012)

January 30, 2012

Pan Blur

January 29, 2012

The texture of this is something I really didn't expect, it looks like these were made with a paint brush to me. There aren't any special effects applied, even the LR Clarity slider is on the positive side of zero (that is making more clarity, less fuzziness). I was inspired to try this by a picture that appeared on Juha's Light Scrape blog last week. I think it had been on my list of things to try for some time before that.

Forest Impressions I

Forest Impressions I

France (2012)

Forest Impressions II

Forest Impressions II

France (2012)


I'm looking forward to applying this technique to some other scenes, I'd like to try something horizontal, or even a swirl. These were with 1/10 and 1/8 second exposures, respectively, I want to play around with that to see what else is possible. Should be fun, it's a really great way to get some smooth colors.

I also found out that this is called 'pan blur'.

January 11, 2012

Photo Critique

January 11, 2012

I made it onto The Discerning Photographer's photo critique again. :)

...And Looked for a Way Out (b&w ii)

And Looked for a Way Out

France (2011)

Andrew didn't like my caption very much, or maybe I'm feeling the critics arrow on that one. I suppose thats the first thing I'd like to respond to. I usually give my picture either very literal (boring) subtitles, or rather whimsical subtitles. I expect that those can be rather difficult to understand, at least until I get better at evoking a response from the reader (in the duChemin sense of the word). Honestly, when I first started "seriously" pursueing any art form (happened to be painting) many years ago, I was inclined to name my pieces with numbers, as in a sequence, because what the heck do you name a abstract art piece? Now I name them whatever I feel like, whatever feeling I have toward the piece. Maybe I'll keep those names to myself sometimes, maybe not. Either way, I think it's important for the artist/idividual/human to name it however they wish, and stick with it in the face of critics. The title is a marker, a piece of the art and a part of the act of creation. Only take it back if you feel like it, exclusive of the pressure from outside.

Andrew's other comments are on the processing, which I fully believe I could use a lot more learning in, even today. Even after what I said yesterday. I definitely know more now than I did this summer, but I wouldn't say I really know what the heck I'm doing. So, let me just quote him here:

This is a nice image that would be better with a more interpretive toning job, in my opinion: I’d like to see the trees darkened to enhance the sense of foreboding and the foggy vanishing point brightened in contrast to the rest.

Some of this is a little funny to me, because I've already darkened the image from what I had at first. See here, a small version:

...And Looked for a Way Out (b&w)

And looked for a way out (first b&w version)


Much lighter. And to the "original" color version:

...And looked for a Way Out

And looked for a way out (color)


Maybe I was so subtle in my processing that you can't tell, but I've actually done both of the suggestions, and lightened the road some too up in the first (top) picture. But, knowing that I don't know everything, I revisited this image again, threw caution to the wind and really burned that exit hole, dodged the forest (okay, just lowered the exposure slider to -0.8 in LR). Here it is:

The Way Out

The Way Out (for the Discerning Photographer)


I think it looks quite dark, but it might look quite nice this way when printed. It's hard for me to tell when images start to get dark. It's somewhere else that I'm struggling. Anyway, thanks Andrew!

search